Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.

نویسندگان

  • Richard Neitzel
  • Sebrina Somers
  • Noah Seixas
چکیده

The attenuation provided by a hearing protection device (HPD) in the field is usually estimated by applying a derating factor to the laboratory-determined noise reduction rating (NRR) of the HPD. However, attenuation is highly dependent on individual-specific HPD fit. Prediction of an individual's attenuation depends on the accuracy of the measurement system and the variability of attenuation over time (e.g. after HPD refitting). Variability in attenuation and attenuation test systems has not been adequately characterized to allow for such an assessment. This study compared attenuation measurements made with two systems, Real-Ear-at-Threshold (REAT) and Microphone-in-Real-Ear (MIRE), on 20 workers using two earplugs (foam and custom-molded). Workers' perceptions of the earplugs were also evaluated. Individuals' attenuation results were summarized as personal attenuation ratings (PARs, similar to NRRs). Variability in PARs from between-subject, within-subject and within-day (i.e. repeated tests on a subject without earplug refitting) differences was assessed and used to present the lower confidence limit, or uncertainty factor (UF), of an average individual's attenuation. The custom-molded earplug PARs achieved a higher mean percentage of labeled attenuation than did the foam earplug with both test systems. The custom-molded earplugs also had higher overall acceptance among workers. MIRE PAR levels were lower than REAT levels for both earplugs, but the relationship between the two test systems was highly variable. The MIRE system had lower within-day variability than the REAT system. One individual's MIRE results were highly influential; removal of these results greatly reduced the UF for the custom-molded earplug/MIRE combination. UFs ranged from 8.8 to 13.5 dB. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating variability in individual-specific protection results for personal protective equipment like HPDs, rather than relying on single measurements.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Preferred Methods for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation

There are numerous well-documented measurement methods available to evaluate hearing protector attenuation, however, some are flawed or difficult to implement and some can and have been misused with the erroneous results fostering misleading conclusions. This paper will examine the three most robust methods including the “gold standard” in hearing protector attenuation measurements, namely real...

متن کامل

Session 1aNS: Advanced Hearing Protection and Methods of Measurement I 1aNS4. Comparison of subjective and objective methods for the measurements of hearing protector devices attenuation and occlusion effect

With the increase popularity of individual fit testing and miniaturization of electronic components, the Field-Microphone-In-Real-Ear approach (F-MIRE) is becoming more appealing and well suited for estimating hearing protection devices (HPD) attenuation both in laboratory and in "real world" occupational conditions. The approach utilizes two miniature microphones to simultaneously measure the ...

متن کامل

An educated guess on the workplace attenuation variability of ear muffs.

The attenuation variability of hearing protector devices plays a primary role in determining compliance, or lack of, with occupational noise exposure limits. This study presents an estimate of the ear muff attenuation variability, which includes several factors (biological diversity, positioning, sound field, ageing) for which specific information from laboratory studies is available. A mean va...

متن کامل

Hearing Protector Performance: How They Work and What Goes Wrong in the Real World

In previous EARLogs1 we have discussed how to measure and rate the attenuation of hearing protection devices (HPDs) in the laboratory, how these devices affect auditory communications, and perhaps most importantly how HPDs perform in real world (RW) environments. It was found that laboratory attenuation measurements significantly overestimate the RW performance of HPDs, due to the unrealistic, ...

متن کامل

Effect of hearing protection and hearing loss on warning sound design

Warning sound devices are commonly used in noisy workplaces to warn workers of potentially dangerous situations. Warning sound perception depends on many factors, including warning sound levels relative to the background noise, hearing protection and hearing status. Although national and international standards (i.e. ISO 7731) are available to guide the choice of warning sound devices, none app...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The Annals of occupational hygiene

دوره 50 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006